![](https://neoshare.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/1bf5HVx22Yd3LHTRzUN_1Lw-750x420.png)
A New Evaluation Protocol is Proposed for WSOL. It’s Found Out That CAM (CVPR’16) is NOT Worse Than ADL (CVPR’19), CutMix (ICCV’19), SPG (ECCV’18), ACoL (CVPR’18) and Hide-and-Seek (HaS, ICCV’17)
![Sik-Ho Tsang](https://neoshare.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Review-SPG-Self-Produced-Guidance-Weakly-Supervised-Object-Localization.jpeg)
In this story, Evaluating Weakly Supervised Object Localization Methods Right, by Yonsei University, LINE Plus Corp., NAVER Corp., and University of Tuebingen, is presented. In this paper:
- A new evaluation protocol is proposed where full supervision is limited to only a small held-out set not overlapping with the test set.
- Five most recent WSOL methods have not made a major improvement over the CAM baseline as shown above.
- Existing WSOL methods have not reached the few-shot learning baseline, where the full-supervision at validation time is used for model training.
This is a paper in 2020 CVPR with over 24 citations. (Sik-Ho Tsang @ Medium)